| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery > Epub ahead of print

doi: https://doi.org/10.3342/kjorl-hns.2026.00395    [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of Early and Late Dropout Factors in Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Jong Kwan Kim , Myoung Su Choi
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
폐쇄성 수면무호흡증 양압기 치료에서 조기 및 후기 탈락 요인의 비교
김종관 , 최명수
을지대학교 의과대학 대전을지대학교병원 이비인후과학교실
Correspondence  Myoung Su Choi ,Tel: +82-42-611-3133, Email: mschoi@eulji.ac.kr
Received: 18 May 2026; Revised: June 24, 2026   Accepted: 6 July 2026.  Published online: 4 August 2026.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives
Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), yet a substantial proportion of patients discontinue treatment, with underlying causes potentially differing by dropout timing. This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics, polysomnography (PSG) findings, and reasons between early dropouts (ED; ≤3 months) and late dropouts (LD; >3 months), and to identify factors associated with dropout timing.
Subjects and Method
This retrospective study included 106 OSA patients who discontinued PAP therapy (ED, n=62; LD, n=44), classified by the Korean National Health Insurance 3-month adherence evaluation cutoff. Dropout causes were extracted from structured nursing records and categorized into four mechanistic domains.
Results
Baseline demographics and PSG parameters were compared between groups. Device discomfort (52.5% vs. 14.0%, p<0.001) and expiratory pressure resistance (22.6% vs. 0%, p<0.001) predominated in ED, whereas lack of perceived treatment effect (8.2% vs. 44.2%, p<0.001) and lack of disease awareness (1.6% vs. 15.9%, p=0.008) characterized LD. The Firth’s penalized logistic regression indicated that device discomfort was independently associated with ED (penalized odds ratio=3.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-9.99, p=0.012).
Conclusion
PAP dropout mechanisms differ qualitatively by timing. ED is driven by device-related physiological barriers, suggesting that early-phase management should prioritize device adaptation and pressure optimization, while long-term retention requires disease awareness reinforcement and objective efficacy feedback.
Keywords: Adherence Expiratory pressure intolerance Obstructive sleep apnea Positive airway pressure
Editorial Office
Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
103-307 67 Seobinggo-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04385, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3487-6602    FAX: +82-2-3487-6603   E-mail: kjorl@korl.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next